The former Indian Skipper has always on the most debated subject whether he is the best finisher in the history of cricket ODI. The matter has to be decided based on the merits. Before coming to a conclusion, it is important to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the cricketer when it comes to finishing the match. After analyzing his skills, the player has to be compared with those who have exhibited similar capabilities. While studying the acumen of this cricketer, he was judged to be the perfect option to be on the field when the game is in the tight spot.
Finishing a game is not just about playing into the crowd, it is about being a good runner between wickets. The wicketkeeper is not just the quick to pick up runs but also good at judging the possibility of a run. He is great with positions and cuts and can be a complete entertainer hitting the ball into the crowd. The player can put his rivals in a tight corner every time he is on the field forcing the captain to set a field exclusively for his potent. But the irony is, when Dhoni sets his foot on the field, the fielders are always in demand.
The player has exceptional talent and is a great manipulator. He is designed to be the best finisher for ODI matches. The Mr. Cool as he is always dubbed is capable of handling any pressure on and off the field. His capability to put the opposition under check has him and his team at the advantage. He is complimented by his colleagues and contemporaries for his level mindedness and his ability to stay calm even under tremendous pressure. The cricketer has exhibited immense character and strength during tight situations. He can be called the toughest and can handle any situation.
Read Also: How To Scale Alastair Cook In Comparison With Tendulkar And Mark Butcher?
The first ever real-time cricket scoring mobile application and technology was launched by Quickscore. The co-founder of Quickscore, David Geensen says that they are very proud to launch Quickscore, which is the world’s first ever real-time application for cricket scoring. He also says that the smart scoreboard will help in revolutionizing the match experience.
This technology makes cricket scoring very easy. With the handheld app developed by CricHQ, coaches, players or fans can access any information necessary from their smartphone, PC or tablet. This app not only provides scores; it can also provide statistics, pitch maps, DL calculations, 3D wagon wheels graphs and much more.
The hardest thing about keeping scores these days is that the manual way of doing it by changing the scoreboards. This is time-consuming and clumsy and is often prone to error. Quickscore solves this by displaying the common scoreboard for both players and fans. It would also provide a high-quality platform for the advertiser’s benefit too.
Other benefits include high-quality imaging, wireless technology, and better internet connectivity by internal hotspot. It is also energy efficient. The Quickscore boards are 100% water proof and weather proof. They also impact resistant. Having high-quality scoreboards can raise the standard of the viewing experience.
Cricket has become sophisticated, packaged for the modern audience. The statistics and techniques are far more refined than it was before. The umpiring has also become subtle. There is a consensus about the complexity of the game but at the same time not about umpiring. This is because umpires are hardly brought to talk shows are on the commentary panel to discuss the tedious nature of their job. Former players, coaches, captains are seen often decorating the studios and pages of sports magazines, the umpire is the neglected lot. The irony is that the umpire’s point of view is discussed by everyone else except the umpires themselves. The game is now turning hi-tech, and this could be detrimental to the sport, it is predicted by experts.
The irony is that we are not able to accept the conclusion. Expert judgment has become a curse, and it is being replaced mostly by bureaucratic box ticking. When it is far from reality, umpiring has become more regulative. The autonomy the umpire enjoys is no more there. It is not the outcome of the need for best rulings. This is where the media administration becomes superior as they are not able to digest the decision of one person, irrespective of their accomplishment in the field.